Which caused more harm: the black blocs or Assange?

Power is unfair and criminal. We all agree. But how do you beat it?

I'm not going to tease out the reasons why the young rightly take to the streets. We wholeheartedly agree with them. But at the moment many are discussing the use of violence and that is what I would like to talk about, because we don't all agree  with it but it would be foolish to deny that many think that the time has arrived "to put words into action". The kids say: they don't listen to us, let’s smash everything and see if they can go on pretending that we don't exist.

The issue of violence is very complex. Our culture leads us to believe that violence is a great way to tackle problems. A good smack can straighten out a disobedient child. A good armed revolution can bring justice to society. I do not believe that violence can result in anything good, even if I do recognise the right to self defence (insofar as self defence must cease as soon as the glaring threats are no longer present).

On the other hand a problem of indifference exists in the power and censorship of the media and violence remains an effective means of attracting attention. But blocking traffic, smashing windows and damaging cars are actions that bring discredit on the movement and give those in power an excuse to hammer it even harder. Do we agree? What do we hope to achieve?

Certainly, there are rallies which work because they have elements that are sensational or amazing, like to peacefully climb the leaning tower of Pisa or occupy university rooftops. People’s creativity will probably devise other forms of lasting struggle, spectacular and peaceful. If you do not harm anyone and obtain maximum visibility you have won twice over. If however the objective  is to create difficulties for the Cast of Weasels responsible for poor governance, there are many other potent means which do not alienate public opinion  and, on the contrary, achieve the effect of making the rebel movement popular and appealing.

The globalised world of the internet offers us many new possibilities. It doesn’t take much to understand how the actions of the likes of Assange, who published a million classified documents on the web, have the capacity to hit the systems of power very hard, more so than any demonstrations. Certainly, to have access to the Pentagon’s secret files is not a possibility for everyone… But it would be an error to think that there would necessarily have to be great secret agents to wreak havoc on the system. Those in power are so sure of themselves that they hide the traces of their deceptions poorly. If students and contract workers want to respond hand to hand to the worsening conditions of the school system and the research environment they can, for example, start by scrutinising university budgets, and they are sure to discover some discrepancies when reading them. This is especially true in those universities where the rector employs his son, daughter in law, aunties and cousins.
...Hard to believe that someone like that wouldn’t also fiddle with heating costs, expense claims etc.

These days, to make the wheeling and dealing visible and then denounce everything to the magistrate is a proven weapon of war. Whenever comrades have brought transparency to the house of power they have dealt a serious blow to the system.  It is a tactic that many local territory defence groups are using like a club, and it’s working.

We at Santa Cristina have used it successfully to block the construction of a huge enclosure that would have spoiled a marvellous valley. We knew that it was difficult to stop a project that had major vested economic interests behind it. We got together with all the valley locals (from infants to the elderly) and at 6:30 a.m. we occupied the area peacefully, we blocked trucks and excavators which were about to start work. We went to work simultaneously with lawyers and engineers to verify every single authorisation. It didn't take much to discover some rather smart irregularities and within 48 hours the battle was won and we got a binding agreement to preserve the valley landscape.

Imagine if a thousand students dedicated a few days to detailed examinations of the finances of faculties, schools and research centres, to check the legal integrity of interview boards… Imagine if the students got to the heart of the balance sheets and demanded that they stop throwing hundreds of millions of euro out the window every year because schools and universities are lacking in the most basic thermal insulation and everything is based on wastage. Imagine if the contract researchers decided to check how much equipment cost. All this information can be accessed rather easily…

Imagine if someone decided to leave a few tape recorders running, or to shoot a quick video of those professors who make advances towards their female students.

It would be a devastating form of guerrilla warfare…

Translation by Ingrid Clancy and Edward Valentine, MA in Advanced Language Skills, National University of Ireland, Galway.


If you have sex with elephants never lie underneath

Avete amici anglofoni? Segnate loro questo video, grazie!

Jacopo Fo, recital of pieces from:
- Zen and the art of making love
- I love you but your right arm disgusts me. Cut it off.
- Even soles (fish) fake orgarms. Imagine all the rest.
Rome "Teatro dei Satiri" - March 17th and 18th 2006
Production: Eleonora Albanese

TAG: zen, art, making, love, sex, healing, theater, funny, comedy, shows, philosophy, human, insanity

Oh Mr. Obama, please! Only you can help us! (English version)

Oh Mr. Obama, please! Only you can help us!
Mr. Obama, we are here in Italy, in the Empire outskirts, and we write to you because only you can help us.
Something weird is happening here.
Bush, that strange person, decided to build near Vicenza an enormous military base. There was another one already, but he thought it was tiny.
People of Vicenza and many other Italians came down to manifest their disagreement. We don't need at all a new military base, a new monument to money waste, to fear and to hate. We don't need greater missiles full of nuclear bombs.
Your election to the chair of President of the United States has marked a turning point in the history of this planet. Now we can imagine an era of peace, undestanding, communication. An era in which not to kill one another for oil and in which to take energy from the sun, the wind and the oceans.
Then, Mr. President, what has to do with this dream a new shimmering military base?
Do you really want to drop all that money into new underground bunkers, launch pads, bombs?
If someone gets mad, he could already launch enough nuclear missiles to destroy this planet a thousand times. What additional power could you get with this new base? When you end to build it, could you destroy the world the 1001'st time?
Is it really worth the effort? Do you really need it?
With the money spared by renouncing to this project, you could give food and education to a million children. If you, tomorrow morning, could announce such a thing to the world, people would say: "You see, this President really wants to change the world!", and this would protect America more than a hundred military bases.
What are new military bases for, however?
Soviet Union does not exist anymore, and its heirs are slowly opening to progress. War with China for oil will not be, since you are speeding by ten the transition to renewable power sources, with the big investments you are making.
A new military base will not be useful against the enemies of your homeland, wich are terrorists, difficult to hit with atom bombs. At the contrary, by building this mad thing, you will enforce the enemies of USA, who will say: "You see, Americans speak about peace, but build war."
It's not fair, for one who loves the dream of a new world, to invest money and skill to build, once again, cathedrals of terror filled with cannons and barbed wire. We need signs of love. Yes we can! Let's stop the night dogs.
Yesterday, in Vicenza, this dark dream of power caused more wounded people, and more pain.
Right now, this military base is arming the hands of the ones who know only hate.
People who wage war is infiltrating peaceful manifestants. And this fact is enforcing those who, into the police forces, hope the return of blackjacks and tear gas bombs.
Please, Mr. Obama, please! Make the impossible, the unexpected. A love gesture, a faith gesture, a prayer for the mankind's soul. Stop this madness.
We are fighting and screaming, from many years, against this senseless evil. But our protests are crushed, or ignored. We live in a strange place of the world, where wit is momentarily vanished.
We are fighting with all our forces, sincerely, but we are losing.
We can not stop this spinning gear, we are a vassal state, in the outskirts of the Empire. It's being executed here and now what Bush decided for us, and no one here could ever resist. There are treaties, agreements, obligations took by our strange rulers.
We alone can not win this battle of the civilization of peace, against the one of war.
You can do it. Only you can do it. If you act, we will be on your side, like always have before, and even more.
Together we can do it.

Jacopo Fo

The Bishop of Assisi succeeds in preventing Dario Fo from rehearsing Giotto in front of the Basilica.

Once again a misunderstood sense of the “Sacred” brings the ecclesiastic hierarchies to impose censorship.
The recital should have taken place in Assisi between the 2nd and the 5th of June but it would have most certainly caused a scandal. Not from a religious point of view, no, Dario Fo solely had the intention, through this new performance of his,  of proving that a  highly diffused  belief  is wrong.
The paintings within the Upper Basilica or Basilica Superiore attributed to Giotto in fact are not Giotto’s work. And the interesting thing about the matter is that besides being supported by the Franciscan friars of Assisi, Dario Fo’s thesis regarding those extraordinary paintings/frescos proves that Giotto was not the author but another  or other  great contemporary Maestro/s  realized those breathtaking frescos.
Dario Fo created a lecture-performance based upon the above thesis. The performance in divided into three separate evening events, the time needed to argue his thesis basing it upon different historical and technical  details. In particular, the fact that every school from Roman to Tuscan, had a particular, diverse and personalized technique of representing images through painting and the outlines or silhouettes used to reproduce the paintings themselves diversified in style and execution.
All these technical elements create a sort of  fingerprint hidden behind the painting itself, fingerprint that guarantees and assures  that Giotto can’t have participated to the realization of the masterpiece in the nave of the Upper Basilica unless in the role of simple assistant or apprentice.
But the cultural importance of the performance that  should have been rehearsed by Dario Fo with the support of the Mayor of Assisi Claudio Ricci, wasn’t enough for the Bishop Domenico Sorrentino who did not withdraw his veto.
Pop songs in front of the Basilica of San Francesco are fine, young girls dancing and even cabaret is acceptable but, please, do not perform anything from the history of art!
Incredible that in the year 2009 in Italy someone still can veto or forbid  a Nobel Prize Winner  of speaking of Art in front of a church.

The performance “ Giotto o non Giotto” (Giotto or not Giotto) will be recited in July as follows:

2-3 July  in Cesena at the Rocca Malatestina
8-9 July in Florence in front of the Basilica of Santa Croce
25-25 July in Perugia in the San Francesco in Campo square

Letter to Barak Obama, President Elect of the United States of America

Dear Mr. Barak Obama,
President Elect of the United States of America,
we are writing you this letter because first of all we’re Italian, and secondly we find ourselves in difficulty and do not know who we can turn to for help.
Our government has decided that it is not convenient to invest in renewable energy supplies or efficient energy solutions. They say that our country is  on the edge of bankruptcy and that they have no more money to invest. They declare that the only possible solution is to continue polluting and wasting energy.
According to the treaty undersigned in Kyoto, we should reduce Co2 emissions of 6,5% and instead we’ve increased them of 9,9% in the past 7 years. They say that if we should reduce emissions and save on petrol it would cost the nation too much money and many companies would be destined to close down.
Berlusconi, who is always a funny chap, affirmed that considering ecology in his program would be comparable to a person with pneumonia worrying about a hair perm.
Our governors cannot understand that one of the reasons why the current financial  crisis in Italy is more violent than in past years is due to the fact that we keep on wasting energy whilst others have started to save it.

You are most certainly aware that we could do much more, many, many more things with the sun we have here in Italy. But our government doesn’t seem to want to understand. Our government  doesn’t understand that it is absurd that  Austria covers 200 sq.mts of solar panels for the supply of hot water for every 1000 inhabitants whereas Greece covers 240 sq.mts, and Italy only covers but 10 (ten!!!) sq.mts every 1000 inhabitants.
They do not understand that this absence of solar panels is a damage to the economy of every family besides being a damage to our lungs as well as to the environment.; money spent in fossil fuel which could instead have been used to improve the financial situation of Italian families thus giving new impulse to the country’s economy.
Just imagine; our government has recently established to complicate the bureaucratic paperwork which allows to obtain a 55% tax reduction on the purchasing of solar panels, thermal isolation, efficient boilers and other solutions destined to improve energy efficiency within private homes.

They’ve also cut on funds for fiscal detractions. Absolutely dramatic. In our country almost half of  the consumption of  fossil fuels is destined to heat homes and water. According to a research done by the Politecnico di Milano ( a prestigious Italian university in the north of Italy) in the past 30 years families have thrown away an amount of money of equivalent value to their  houses just for the inefficient use of energy. The consumption for heating is far higher than in other European country such as Austria  for example (140-210 Kcal compared to 80 kcal)
Our government cannot understand that the waste of energy is so high that they could finance investments for efficient energy with the money we’re currently throwing away.  With the money the families would be saving they could be paying  the mortgage rates and still have some cash in their pockets instead of spending it on wasted energy.  And it would also be “healthy “for banks to loan money for the installation of energy saving systems: safe investments destined to save money in the long run cutting costs on energy supplies.
But they, our governors, really don’t seem to understand. They halt essential measures such as the project to recuperate oil used for cooking. Just imagine, our restaurants pay a special tax for the disposal of used oil instead of reselling it as in other countries. Every year we throw away 100 thousand tons of oil used for frying instead of using it for the production of  bio diesel.
And we await, uselessly we await for new law decrees to be approved which will improve the development and  production of wind power, biomass and  water power. Italy still hasn’t acknowledged geothermal energy or Led illumination which cuts over 80% of public illumination costs. Those who invest in such “eco-technology “, that is not officially state recognized, lose the opportunity of selling stocks regarding energy efficiency on international markets. A severe damage for those citizens particularly interested in respecting the environment. This is also a way to discourage Italian municipalities from substituting old light bulbs with Led street illumination. And not only: our governors have increased the bureaucracy concerning photovoltaic installments.  Just imagine, in Italy there are 150 photovoltaic installments which compel to international standards, which are functioning perfectly yet have not been “recognized” by the Italian government because the owners forwarded the written documentation concerning the installations with delay, according to due dates defined by the government ; in this case the Gestore Servizi Elettrici (Administrator of Electrical Services and Supplies).  According to our government, these poor guys should throw their installations away because they can’t do anything with them, not even resell them because every single solar panel has a registration number and once the panel is officially refused by the government (an example for this refusal is the late correspondence as above) it cannot be resold or re-presented in new documentation. This always according to government regulations. We think such things can only happen in Italy.
We’re writing to you because we are truly in difficulty. Newspapers and television do not understand the matter about funding alternative energy supplies which consequently  lead to saving money on energy instead of wasting it. Media does not dedicate time to explaining this to people, they do not explain that if we stop wasting money in this way our products will consequently become more competitive and we will, in the end, end up saving money. Our only hope is that this truth come out. Many Italians have respect for the environment and many would highly appreciate a stand on your behalf. We sincerely hope you can give us a hand.
What we  would like you to do, what we would like to ask you to do is to spend a few words in favor of Italy. A speech of yours could make it’s way through the general confusion we find ourselves is concerning the economical crisis and the revolution regarding “eco-technology”.
The consideration that millions of Italians have for you could oblige them to listen to you as well as to reflect on your words.
We appeal to you because all the things we’ve tempted to do and say have been darkened and put to silence. We’re living a very sad period here in Italy.
In other dramatic moments in history, the United States of America came in aid and helped us by sending thousand of troops to fight and many of them died whilst helping us fight Nazi-fascist dictatorship. Fortunately today it’s not THAT bad.
We would be more than happy if an American, just one American, in particular You, could make a phone call to our TG1 (main public TV station).
Maybe they’d understand you even though you speak English.

Thank you,

Jacopo Fo  - Libera Università di Alcatraz www.alcatraz.it
Fabio Roggiolani – Consigliere della Regione Toscana dei Verdi
Roberto Codazzi – blogge
Dario Fo – Nobel prize winner www.dariofo.it
Franca Rame – ex Senator www.francarame.it


Fonte imm


Open letter to American Media

Dear all,
The current situation in Italy is not at all easy, especially when it comes to facing alternative energy supplies as well as maintaining agreements regarding the Kyoto treaty.
Our government has repeatedly stated that the global recession/crisis is a good excuse, if not a wonderful excuse, to cut on investments in this specific sector and, unfortunately, it has already put into act it’s verbal intentions: Decree nr. 185 called “anti-crisis decree” forecasts extreme cuts on costs as far as natural power supplies/energy efficiency are concerned  including a series of bureaucratic complications which make it practically impossible to have access to tax reliefs for those private citizens who intend or  wish to install alternative/natural power plants within or around  their own homes thus supplying to their own needs in an independent and environmental friendly way by improving  energy efficiency.
Just to give you an idea; 820 million Euro were spent in 2007 in comparison to the 82 million foreseen by the end of 2008.
Thermal solar panel installations for the supply of hot water cover 100 sq.mts every 1000 inhabitants in Austria, 240 sq.mts every 1000 inhabitants in Greece and only 10 sq.mts every 1000 inhabitants in Italy. This should give you a general idea of how investments are made in Italy.
The cost coefficient for private heating in the north of Italy corresponds to 140/210 kcal per sq.mt whereas in Austria it corresponds to 80 kcal per sq.mt. The difference between the two costs is absolutely evident.
We’re very worried, and that’s the reason why citizens like ourselves are trying to organize a small event  to attract the attention of Italian media which seem not very interested in the matter.
Our idea is to ask your President elect Mr. Barack Obama for help. How? By requesting Italian citizens to write comments to a major American newspaper where appeals will most certainly be published. Now that the United States is converting to the Green New Deal, Italy should not be of lesser intentions.
What we are asking you is to lend us a hand regarding the diffusion of this initiative guaranteeing, once enacted, to give us enough attention through broadcasting. Even a few lines will be sufficient, even a few lines will be enough to cause a chain reaction on our media which will oblige Italian politicians to include alternative energy supplies in everyday topics in Parliament.
Thank you very much.

Jacopo Fo

Are black people stupid?

by Jacopo Fo

If you look up a history book you’ll find  that blacks are the most stupid people in the world. They  never invented anything, they cannot boast  ancient civilizations, they’ve always been beaten by everyone; Arabs or Europeans indistinctly. 
Blacks were people who submitted to centuries of slavery without rebelling whatsoever. They were just so far behind that they couldn’t even invent an alphabet of their own or a style of writing. They’re still  dying of starvation because they have no spirit of  initiative when it comes to working. And once the colonial regime fell, they started a general massacre killing one another with such a primitive instinct to leave you astonished: millions of dead killed with machetes so as not to waste ammunitions. All we know about black people is that they run fast, they strike hard, they have rhythm and black men have super cocks. Then, then this Obama guy shows up from nowhere and becomes President of the United States.
Leftists like being precise by stating that we are all equal. They even say we all descend from a few black skinned women. Cavalli Sforza proved this through his studies on DNA. Consequently  we are all black, therefore racism makes no sense whatsoever. We may want to add that the majority of black people are poor and desperate, may they be living in the heart of  Africa or some United States ghetto; poor and desperate not because they don’t know how to work or develop but because colonialism destroyed  great African civilizations from the roots by imposing 5 centuries of violence and incredible robberies which left the continent barbarized.  
The first thing to be said is that it SEEMS as if black people don’t have a great history and have not been capable of rebellion just because history books had been censored in the past; capably and completely censored.  With this article I’ll try to restore a few “essential truths”  forgotten along the way.  (Laura Malucelli wrote an interesting book on this matter; “Le società matriarcali nere” “Matriarchy in black societies” with particular attention to slavery and black revolts . You can read an extract in “schiave ribelli” “rebelling slaves”.  All our ancestors were black. They were the first colonizers of Europe, of Asia, of America and Australia. They  gradually lost their “tan” due to the cold weather conditions they were living in. The first settlements along major rivers were black; these people chose to live where the temperature was mild.  They started constructing between 7000 and 3500 afore Christ. They possessed an oral tradition of narration and had knowledge of astronomy, mathematics, geometry besides  having a great ability in building canals, levees, embankments as well as draining swamps for agriculture. They built homes with chimneys and the doors had hinges. They were very successful copper and goldsmiths and chiseled wonderful stone statues. They integrated daily routine with farming  and fishing. They faced oceans on board of tiny canoes built from hollow trunks, and obtained rafts by tying canes together. Their villages had no defensive walls, and in their art and sculptures we find the celebration of the fertility of nature and NOT the celebration of wars or of power.

Their burials were similar for all the members of the community, even women were buried in the same way as men. This shows that men and women were equal and covered equal roles within their social scale; women were not subjugated by men. Besides, an incredible number of erotic images and the representation of breasts and sexual organs indicate a population who preferred celebrating pleasure rather than celebrating conquests and dominations. These societies were defined as matriarchal. Researchers underlined that it was not a condition in which women dominated men but rather a condition of social equity and balance. They coined a new conception, the  “partnership society”, where power was equally shared. For more than one and a half centuries  the existence of this society was denied by official historiography and those who affirmed the existence of the “partnership society”  would be mocked and emarginated.  Today we have an enormous quantity of archeological proofs which attest the existence of florid matriarchal societies in China, India, the Middle East and Egypt. They exchanged merchandise and goods with other populations without handing down male casts or war culture. This civilization created a prototype of writing based on ideograms which are identical from Egypt to India. We owe this civilization important, I daresay, fundamental discoveries such as the hammer and the hoe. From the net for fishing to utensils for farming, from pottery to weaving. Up until the year 3500 before Christ we register continuous migrations in the heart of central Africa which expand in all directions. Numerous studies have been made which state that many words used in agriculture nowadays derive from the San languages of Africa.
In the meantime, European-Asian steppes were beginning to bare the first signs of animal breeding such as horses. These populations were obliged to maintain aggressive attitudes due to the need of protecting their flocks from wild animals as well as predators. They improved their warrior qualities thus creating a society of male leaders dominating women. They invented bows and arrows for hunting so as to succeed in capturing and killing large animals or even men and contemporarily learned to tame horses transforming them into important instruments of war. Ever since 3500 before Christ these warriors,  who in centuries had changed the color of their skin from “tanned” to pale, whose noses had become narrower and pointier, whose lips had thinned down, these warriors came to know a new demographic explosion made possible by the maturity reached through raising and breeding of animals. Pushed into looking for new lands due to over population as a consequence to breeding, these warriors migrated towards fertile lands inhabited by black fishermen living within matriarchal societies. These migrations have been demonstrated by the researcher Marija Gimbutas, proven through archeological findings as well as Cavalli Sforza’s considering DNA analysis and linguistic tracks. (See Marija Gimbutas “Il Linguaggio della Dea”, “The Language of the Goddess”, published by Neri Pozza and Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, Paolo Menozzi, Alberto Piazza “Storia e geografia dei geni umani” “History and geography of human genes” published by Adelphi, Milan in 1977).

The history of the following millenniums is that of conflict between the two cultures. Menes, the first legendary Egyptian pharaoh represented in a famous  bas-relief (Narmer table) had straight hair and a very straight nose. He was  surrounded by beheaded men with curly hair and flat noses

And still today the majority of very dark skinned, untouchable Indians descend from populations defeated by hordes of white breeders 3000 years ago. And what about the heroic resistance of many farming fishermen who fought off invasions. In fact, we can also find black pharaohs . And in China in the year 1200 a. C where we find a few black emperors belonging to the Shang population which was a mix of people from diverse ethnic groups (should you wish to look up alternative information concerning black civilization groups:
with particular  attention towards  the  black Shang population:
concerning the hypothesis on black skinned Olmecs:

Third millennium barbarian invasions  conquered  the Middle East, Europe and North Africa,  without penetrating  beyond the Sahara region, and for another 4 thousand years the African civilization developed in a flourishing and independent manner. The Arab penetration was extremely slow and only reached a portion of black Africa.
Whilst in Europe people were still living inside caves, African astronomers had traced accurate celestial maps. During the year 1000, in Timbuktu there were far many more books than in London. Africans traded with India and China and great reigns were born. But the must peculiar thing about African history is that for millenniums the populations continued to prosper conserving the major part of their matriarchal culture, developing an extremely efficient social system.
This regarded populations defined as “single mullet”, that is, populations without dominating casts nor kings. All the village members had equal rights and established relationships with neighboring villages in an equal and cooperative way. These populations improved complex social systems covering the interests of all through cooperation. Besides individual vegetable gardens there were also collective vegetable patches used to face possible extraordinary communal needs. And centuries before the first European bank was founded, these populations had already established complex insurance programs  against disasters. Such programs contemporarily contained the idea of a bank as well as a public limited company. For example, ten villages would unite and reciprocally invest in one another’s economy raising incomes in good times and diminishing damages in bad times. Every year each and every village donated 10% of it’s harvest to the village  most in need which would, consequently, develop it’s own economy. In the following years that very same village would  return the initial “loan” received by donating another 10% of a far more abundant harvest.  Such systems of cooperation existed before the coming of the white man and  have resisted up until today. They are called “tontinas”. These “single mullet” African societies resisted slavery  by uniting and combating furious wars which saw them, sometimes, winners. In other cases they withdrew leaving entire regions inhabited, migrating towards impenetrable  areas where their existence was safe from slave merchant’s attacks.
When these men and these women were captured they proved to be terrible slaves, slaves of the worst kind, for they would not submit to their condition of slavery. Throughout South America hundreds of slave revolts took place and ex slaves  reunited in villages called “quilombos”. Some of these villages expanded and one of them, Palmares in Brazil, resisted for almost  an entire century against slave-driver assaults. If you research on the internet you will find plenty of material concerning this subject.
I’m going to tell you one of these stories, the story of a slave rebellion, an almost unknown revolution of  groups of thousands of slaves who succeeded in defeating the Portuguese thus saving themselves from slavery. These rebels were called Kalunga.

Slave Maudi is a dangerous guy.
When they arrived in chains within a slave ship, they were far more dead than alive. The Portuguese had already had terrible experiences with those guys, those captured in certain zones.  Maudi was dragged in chains, he was dragged underground and obliged to pickaxe rocks in darkness. And not even whilst he was digging did they remove the chains from his wrists because he was black and mean just like all the black and mean men in chains slaving by his side. Portuguese understood  that they couldn’t show their back’s to those black slaves because those slaves were particularly crazy. Maudi would dig, eat the shit they’d feed him, and whilst looking at those who had arrived afore, he became fully aware that he didn’t have much time to live. He needed an idea, he needed to find a solution which would allow him to escape the hell he was in, that dark and stinking hell of excrements  and gangrene; black people’s skin rotted where chains constantly rubbed against it. Finally and idea did come! After nightly discussions with other slaves, a solution came to mind.  They had to rebel, in one way or the other, they had to rebel and kill the guards but how could they do that in chains? The slaves who had most resisted, those who had survived torture and slavery for the majority of time knew that white men, those insane and assassin whites,  had a God, a male God which they turned to and honored particularly once a year on the day of His birth.  A God who had been immediately killed by other white men; those pale skinned devils who had crucified him on a wooden cross so as to guarantee him a slow and painful death. It was incredible to their eyes, to the slave’s eye, to kill a Divinity especially if it was the only God but the Kalungas came to believe that white people were only capable of killing. The previously mentioned idea consisted in converting to the white man’s religions thus participating to that yearly celebration; the celebration of the Birth of an assassinated God.  This would have permitted them to be temporarily freed from their chained condition and….they could have fought and killed their torturers who were, in fact, small and weak and disgusting beings. They’d never had the strength or determination to resist blacks, and most certainly the slaves would have won. So they decided to inform the armed guards (who had guns and shimmering swords) and slave-drivers that they too wished to adore the God of the whites and they swore they would have never again adored Mother Goddess who nurtures all creatures. They asked their jailers to free hands and feet from chained conditions so as to pray the God they had chosen to adore. But the guards with iron helmets said no. So they asked permission for dancing. They wanted to prepare a ritual dance for their new God, a dance of praise and respect for the killed God. The ritual dance would have taken time to be prepared because it’s difficult to dance when you’re in chains. The  armed guards finally gave them permission because they, the guards, thought it would be quite a funny sight to see; “wild” men tripping and stumbling on their own chains. And this is how the Kalunga slaves invented Capoeira, a technique apt to “free” you whilst apparently dancing in praise. A combat style done in chains! Once the men were capable enough to coordinate movements they attacked the guards who wore shoes on their feet instead of walking barefoot like the black man. The slaves killed almost everyone and freed approximately thirty thousand men from chains. This happened in the silver mines around the Rio de la Plata. Subsequently they won the army which had been sent to punish them, but this time they fought riding horses, using swords, guns, canons, iron helmets and wearing shoes on their feet, and that very day Maudi was at the head of 200 warriors who were using cannons to defeat the enemy. There was a big discussion because everybody knew that more and more Portuguese soldiers would have arrived, yet they were all aware that those who adore the Great Mother cannot fight. They decided to flee, they decided to find a place to stay where they would have never been found, and precisely in the deepest of forests. It would have been impossible for thirty thousand people to return to Africa. Besides, they were doubtful  of what they could have found once home. So they sent the most capable of hunters and the most acknowledged regarding herbs  to explore the Amazon forest. An immense undertaking which had to be fulfilled within the shortest of times. Two months passed without any response from the people who had undertaken the exploration, and  fortunately still no Portuguese ships could be seen along the shore.
Finally the news; someone had found an ideal location at an approximately twenty days walk. A place which could have hosted all people, a place which would have protected them from military incursions. And so they started to march bringing all they could bring with them, all they could carry on their shoulders and on the horses backs because there were no roads in the place  they were moving to. They walked from encampment to encampment. They walked for two years covering more than one thousand kilometers. They walked until they reached rich and flourishing highlands where the climate was gentle and hospitable.
For 250 years the sons of their sons lived on unreachable  highlands without ever coming across a white man. Only in 1955 did some researchers find their way through the Amazon straight to where the Kalunga had migrated. Slavery was no longer legal in South America! Today Brazil counts over 2000 quilombos that are inhabited by descendants of the rebel slaves who fought for their rights.

A completely different way of thinking
As previously mentioned, the ancient African civilization carries a different way of thinking and has evolved reaching original and wonderful forms which leave us amazed and astonished in consequence of diversity and distance between their and our worlds, their and our mind structure concerning victory and defeat, dominion and annihilation, vengeance. These experiences prove how poor and violent western culture is concerning ethics. Here’s two illuminating examples:

South Africa: the Courts of Forgiveness. 
When the racist regime fell, Nelson Mandela understood that he had to ask his people a difficult question. An impossible question that could never had been asked European countries, probably even incomprehensible to us due to our mental structure. He asked; “what should we do to those who tortured us, who killed us, who kept us in chains, who humiliated us? What should we do to those who killed our fathers, who raped our mothers, our wives, our daughters? What should we do to those dogs that constantly bit at our lives?  Are we sure it’s going to be worth killing them, keeping them in prison, punish them?” and this is how the big discussion began. No one doubted that thieves or  assassins could be jailed so as to avoid their committing other crimes thus allowing them to undergo a process of rehabilitation,  but what about those executioners  and their instigators who had tortured an entire nation for more than ten years?  It really seemed as if there was no possibility in applying the same kind of reasoning. The crime or crimes were too big, too immense to be punished. After infinite discussions,  it was decided to not punish those guilty of the most barbarian and tremendous crimes ever perpetrated in South Africa.
No, I’m not crazy. This is how things really went, and they, the people, behaved the correct way.
These black guys still have a strong component of their ancient matriarchal culture which recognizes the idea of spiritual value, the spiritual value of an experience, and the interconnection between all phenomenas.   This culture facilitates the understanding and identification (empathic identification) between victims thus allowing people to comprehend how one can feel when put into a certain situation. If you’ve been subject to violence , even  simple vengeance cannot be satisfying for your nature. The horror and disgust you’ve experienced on your own skin , the stigmata of humiliation and memories made of torment and regret will not change through revenge. Even if you kill the person who tortured you, even if you lead him to a slow and painful death, your perception of the horror you’ve gone through will not change. Bantù culture has a concept which is far higher than vengeance itself: the consolation of the victim.

So these people asked themselves what could really change their states of mind and partially redeem the injustices they’d been victims of. They said; “we refuse vengeance as the sole solution for relieving pain and substitute vengeance with understanding.”  Pain can be overcome if shared collectively. When the tortured man returns to his village and talks about the 100 times he was whipped, even his friends might  ask themselves whether he’s exaggerating. They won’t doubt his being  whipped but , was he sure it was 100 times and maybe not 70 times instead? The tortured person wants to be believed for the experience he’s been through and for the entity of the pain undergone. This is the only possible small consolation.  The black people’s government decides to create an incredible, legal institute: the Court of Forgiveness. For years they went on hearing people. Victims would introduce themselves and tell their stories explaining all they’d been through and accusing those who had tortured them. Torturers were obliged to go to court and confess their deeds in detail; the crimes they had committed,  when and whey they’d committed them.  They would receive no punishment whatsoever should they openly admit their deeds. In this way there was evident truth and nobody could or can deny evident truth. No one in South Africa can doubt about the terrible crimes committed in that country because criminals have admitted and confessed their deeds.  Declarations have been filmed and transmitted on TV. It took years to list, describe, and prove the entity of crimes committed.
Nowadays people still deny Nazi crimes,  Stalinist crimes, Pinochet, Greek or Argentinian colonel’s crimes. This denial is unfortunately tied to the fact that punishments were perpetrated as an act of vengeance, a process which automatically generates a defense that  tends to deny or reject responsibilities and faults. And this negation of the horrors of the past, more or latent horrors of the past, sows hatred and insatiable resentments.  But beware! Forgiveness  is not an action of renouncement but the action  of substituting vengeance with the awareness of undergone atrocities.
You cannot react in front of horror. In Yugoslavia, during the second world war,  the Nazi Croatian regime exterminated more than a million Serbs. The crime was censured by Tito in name of the  national reconciliation.  Not facing  pain after a genocide of such entity has proven to be far more devastating than facing it with a spirit of vengeance. After a few years the balloon exploded. Journalists who were interviewing Serbian  combat squads during ethnic war were quite astonished when hearing soldiers sum the number of dead during the persecutions in the 1940’s.  For many Serbians the war had never finished, never since then. It had only been frozen for 50 years.
“How much are you willing to pay to wash the rear-end of a dying man?”  I read a story in  “Nigrizia” (a combonian missionary magazine), and found it particularly interesting because it told about a self-managed sanitary assistance run by some  the world’s poorest farmers. A net of solidarity within a tiny village: these farmers  employ there time washing and feeding the sick, alleviating their sufferings by using medical herbs, wild herbs, because medicines do not reach the place they live in.
The magazine published a young girl’s letter addressed to the village committee. More or less it stated as follow;  you know me, you know who I am. Many a times you have held me in your arms and when in need, you received my parents too. When they died you took care of me and now I live requiting your hospitality by working  in the village  vegetable garden . I wish to thank you for all you’ve done for me but I would contemporarily  like to ask you a big favor.  By biggest dream is that of caring for others, caring for the ill.
 As you know, I volunteer in the vegetable garden and am therefore not paid for what I do. For this reason I cannot pay to care for other people.  I would like to make a suggestion, an exception to the rules; allow me a double shift in the garden, and in this way I’ll succeed in paying my right to care for other people.
Believe me! When I read this I jumped out of my chair and had to go back and read the article again. I mean there IS  a place in the world where a girl implores to pay through an exchange of double volunteering so as to gain the right to cure  other people because she doesn’t have the money to do so? But who are these people? The poorest farmers on Earth pay cash, they actually pay their right to cure the sick? Why? Simple,  thanks to  elements within the  matriarchal culture, elements which have survived through centuries, elements which people believe essential  such as taking care of death rather than being afraid of it thus censoring it. They believe, they feel that, the fear of death needs to be soothened, that there really is no reason for being afraid of death or of the dying. And these people know something else I unfortunately discovered late in life; I always tried to avoid death as well as relating to people who were dying. I was terrorized by the emotions that these encounters with death could have risen in heart and mind. Then destiny put me into a situation I could neither hide nor run from. To run from it would have been far more painful than to face the terror I had of death. Life gave me the opportunity of finding myself side by side with people of great value who were dying. People of great value don’t die like people who are worth nothing.  If you’ve ever spoken to someone who’s dying; someone of inestimable value who’s dying, then you know what I’m talking about. It’s an incredible experience. 
I remember when my great-grandmother Matilde died. She was a wonderful great-grandmother. I was embracing an almost nonexistent body, and crying,  incapable of controlling my fears. She was caressing my head and consoling me. She said, “come on, it’s not that bad, I’ve lived so many years, I had a great time, I enjoyed life, I loved my daughters, my nieces, my gentle grandnieces. Now I’m dying and it isn’t that important. As a matter of fact, it’s better this way. I am quite tired.”
I also  had the chance of standing side by side another wonderful, dying woman. She only had a few more days to live, she was fully aware of her death and aware of the fact that she was leaving two small daughters behind. What most concerned her were her daughters, the awareness of leaving them without a mother, of the pain her death would have caused the children. And even though this sword was deep in her heart, even though this matter worried her more than her own death, Marina succeeded in showing me the capacity and the capability of still being present in her own life, happy of existing with intact amazement for life and even for the unintelligibility of death itself.
I owe both these women very much. They shared the sensations of  their ending lives with me. They taught me that we can both be gentle and contemporarily strong in facing death.  They taught me how to relate to death, that even though you’ve feared death your entire life, when you find yourself in the condition of having to face your personal death, you can no longer afford being scared. I cannot but thank those whose schooled me in such sense. They gave me the strength of hoping that I too, one day, will be pervaded by the Great Spirit of Braveness when I will have to face my last steps as a heavy, energetically coherent and physically present figure. I’ve seen it happen, yes, these two women should me it can truly happen so I know that it could happen to me as well.
For the very same reason I would also like to thank the people who allowed me to try and alleviate their pains and their fears. If you understand the value of this, if you understand that human beings have the need, the necessity  of coming into contact with the ill and the dying because the ill and the dying can be the most important teachers in our life. If you understand this, then you are ready, no, you’re willing to give death a value, you’re willing to pay an expensive tax so as to gain this privilege. The dying need money to affront particular needs. You’re more than happy to give them money because what you receive back cannot be priced, it is priceless. In western countries we tend to run from death, we tend to avoid and escape death, and then we soothe our anxiety of death by watching hundreds of thousands of deaths on television, may these TV deaths be true or false, may there be rapes, kidnappings or violence, we sit and watch.

Concerning the Courts of Forgiveness:


Nelson Mandela speaks out
The ex-president makes a point on the rebirth of his Country after the apartheid and the activities run by the “Commission for  truth and reconciliation”.

South Africa, healing is possible

“Today, the families of apartheid victims are aware of what happened to their relatives.: death penalty was used as a pretext to assassinate black people”. Maria De Falco Marotta (“Avvenire”, 31.07.07) Nelson Mandela is one of the current most important  moral and political guides: an international hero who dedicated his life to fight racial oppression. A fight which brought him the Nobel Prize for Peace in 1993 as well as becoming President of his Country after apartheid. He is respected everywhere being considered a vital force in the fight for human rights and racial equality. They say that Mandela’s smile is the most famous smile in the world. And we can understand why. He who spent almost thirty years in prison in the name of human rights for his people; he who talks about mass slaughters caused by  Aids in his country without hesitating whatsoever on the words used, who gives his detention number (prisoner identification number) to “Robben Island”; 46664 the CD registered at the Greenpoint Stadium in Cape Town organized to create awareness regarding Aids; who at the age of 85 takes a few ethnic dance steps, which belong to the tradition of his Country, whilst raising the Cup of the World Football Championship 2010 towards the sky. The first football championships ever hosted in the black continent. He  who has at least 130 sites on the net that write about him, who untiring travels throughout the world to cancel prejudicial myths concerning the “melting pot” of his Nation. Regal and proud, mindful of his respect for human dignity,  he does not avoid answering anybody’s questions. People oppress him with affection and attention while asking him “President Mandela, what is freedom, you who have suffered the loss of freedom?” “It is a flame no one can blow out. It is a flame that men and women throughout the entire world will always keep alive, even if this means risking their own lives.”  “President Mandela, how do you hope this third millennium will be?” “Unfortunately there are still a lot of people who languish in poverty, slaves of famine, of intolerance and ignorance. I hope that with the assistance and cooperation of many, abuses and injustices on children and women come to an end and that indifference towards misery remains but an ugly phenomena belonging to the twentieth century.” “Knowing your interest for history, where would you locate apartheid on the scale of atrocities perpetrated in the past century?” “Excluding the atrocities committed to Jewish people during the second world war, no other crime in the world has been unanimously condemned such as apartheid. The worst fact about this is that a minority of people decided to suppress the majority of the Country using the name of God to justify the vilenesses committed.”  “Do you feel that that the human rights violations committed during apartheid were more terrible than those suffered in Latin American countries such as Chile, El Salvador, Argentina?” “The Commission of Truth and Reconciliation listened to many horrible events. We exhumed tombs where we found the corpses of people assassinated only because they had dared face and/or withstand white authorities: men, women, children. the elderly. Brutalities committed against innocent people were more than horrible, and this is but a part of the story. Too many people suffered and there were occasions in which physical aggressions wasn’t as bad as the psychological oppression  suffered by black people during apartheid. No words can be found to describe psychological torture.”

“Another Nobel Prize winner for Peace, archbishop Desmond Tutu, has highlighted the important values of transparency and purity which distinguish the Commission for Truth and Reconciliation. How do you interpret the role of the Commission, role which has amazed the entire world? How do you judge the process of “cleaning” which the Commission undertook and finished?”  “According to me, the healing of South Africa has been a long process, a painful and memorable moment in history , and the Commission contributed magnificently to this because finally the families of victims of the cruelty of  apartheid know what really happened to their beloved ones. Some of them even succeed in listening to the atrocities confessed by agents of the apartheid and replied with forgiveness. Obviously there are many others who still are so bitter about the violence perpetrated that they cannot forget the pain of having lost someone during apartheid. In general, I feel that the Commission has done an extraordinary job by helping us take a distance from our past thus concentrating on the present and the future. Archbishop Tutu has concluded something almost inconceivable to human mind in spite of all the difficulties the Commission for Truth and Reconciliation had to face. Many people feel the treaty the Commission negotiated is absolutely wonderful. Especially when it comes to talking about forgiveness and  “ubuntu” in times like these.” “What are “unbuntu” and forgiveness? What do they mean?” “Forgiveness is conscience of the other,  awareness of the other, understanding the differences, admitting guilt and responsibility, the need to go beyond mere words. Love is born from forgiveness. This is the real sense of “ubuntu”, a philosophy deeply embedded in the soul of black African people including South Africans. But, in my country, all those who desire  or have desire of forgiveness need to solicit it personally”. “The Commission for Truth and Reconciliation has proposed to cite  all those people who never showed up at Court; neither did they ever state  perpetrated violence nor did they declare undergone abuses.” “ Don’t political realities complicate the way to justice?” “When we were a movement, a movement fighting for liberation, all we had to do was succeed in mobilizing the masses within our Country and concentrate on our strength by using it against white supremacy.  Instead, since we’re at the government, we have a Constitution which sanctions the dominion of law and all are subject to it. Not only this; we’ve adopted measures that guarantee this Constitution because we don’t want it to be just a piece of written paper that can be torn anytime. We’ve changed it into a living document. We created structures which tie the government to the Constitution thus obliging to respect it. We have  an ombudsman who defends the people. Any citizen can turn to him with complaints in case of offense or if seeking for justice. We have a human rights Commission  formed by famous South Africans but, above all, we have the “Constitutional Court” which has cancelled, for example, certain governmental activities. We have to obey to the  state institutions we’ve created. The Commission for Truth and Reconciliation is a highly respected institution, men and women who are members of it have done an excellent job under worst circumstances and it is for this, according to me, that we have to respect everyone without any exceptions whatsoever, for what has been done for this Country of mine”. “When you left prison, the Republic of South Africa was, just as the United States, one of the countries with the highest number of “legal” executions. Once you became President, one of the first things you did was to abolish death penalty. The index of crime in South Africa induces many people to request that  death penalty be once again reinstated do as to fight criminality in a more efficient way. What is your opinion regarding this?”  “I’m against death penalty because it reflects an animal instinct which continues to be present in human beings. There are no proofs whatsoever that death penalty is a deterrent to crime, it has never been proven that it reduces delinquency.  What diminishes crime rate is the fact of being aware that you’re going to spend some time in prison if you commit a crime. In other words, what we need is an efficient political system, capable of fighting crime. For this reason we’ve adopted measures to improve the quality and capacity of our police. Death penalty is not the answer. The answer is to improve government efficiency. Death penalty in South Africa was used as an excuse to assassinate, especially when applied to black people. White people were hardly ever sentenced to death. This was  a tradition which belonged to the once South Africa,  but it is a practice which we’ve chosen to leave behind which no one will ever resume”.


Rapist is totally frigid

Of late, I have been listening to and reading a number of debates about rape.
I have found the contentions of the people engaged in this battle absolutely correct; however, at this juncture, I wonder whether we are really invalidating - might I say, unhinging - the ideology of violence.
I wonder whether it is not high time for Italy to bear in mind and put to good use the experience of feminists in other countries who have, long since, unceasingly attacked both sexual violence and its deep cultural roots. The crux of the matter is that, in Italy, the undue influence, the coercion of its authoritarian Catholicism is most unconscionable.
We are still overpowered by Sexual Taboos!
(And, in this context, we could expatiate at length on the relationship between sexual disinformation, record numbers of rapes, record levels of corruption, and record breaking lack of freedom in the media along with the very existence of Berlusconi, the Living Anomaly…)
In Italy, the first point about which very little has been and is being said is the crucial relationship between rape and pleasure.
The prevailing idea in the (Italic) feuding patriarchal culture regards rape as a winning act of dominion.
The male manages to gain pleasure from a woman against her will, humiliating her.
This firm belief is one of the elements that increase raped women’ s sufferings.
However, is the picture really thus?
By no means, as affirmed by such nearly archaic texts as William Reich’s “The Sexual Revolution”. Overpowered by the patriarchal culture of dominion, the rapist IS UNABLE  TO EXPERIENCE AN ORGASM.
This is an essential detail upon which Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian feminists and therapists have been working for decades.
Experiences gained from programmes conducted for the rehabilitation of  convicted rapists have demonstrated that they suffer from acute schizophrenia. Rapists are totally frigid males, that is: their ejaculation is not matched by any orgasmic pleasure; and the only pleasure they can feel is but mental. In other words, it’ s a kind of chemical climax caused by a discharge by the body of substances similar to heroin. Such discharges are triggered by the emotional shock ensuing the  practice of violence per se and are equal to those experienced by soldiers on the battlefield or by criminals during a robbery. Evidently, this kind of pleasure is out of all relation to the rapture, the bliss of sexual orgasm.
Under the sexual point of view, rapists are totally frigid individuals and their pleasure is but a superficial, chemical and mechanical reaction connected to the stress of violence.
Let us say it loud and clear! First and foremost because it will rid rape victims of that surplus of humiliation prompted by the idea that they were the table set for a gory feast of pleasure.
It is a subtle, yet essential point. On account of personal circumstances, I have been in touch with many raped women. The first step, agonizing but essential, consists in facing up to and dealing with the memory of the pain. In other words, the victim should become aware of the turmoil of the inner voices encroaching on her mind. The natural pain caused by the violence inflicted upon her is heightened by the burden dumped on her by the patriarchal ideology:
1) The sense of guilt: you were raped  because you were not chaste. You did not hold out long enough against violence because you were filthy inside and looking for trouble.
2) You are worthless! You are a nonentity. Men need only to take and use you to extort their sensuous enjoyment  from you. You are powerless, you cannot even prevent their taking pleasure in you. And since you have given pleasure, you have partaken in the rape. Your suffering is nothing; the man raping you does not even feel your anguish.
Understanding the structure of the pain inflicted upon a victim of sexual violence is tantamount to getting to the heart of the horror of these two wicked ideas.
Understanding that part of the anguish that ensues not only the mere brutality of the act but also the context within which that violence is lived: it is not easy to understand the impossibility for the rapist to reach his orgasm as an experience contrasting with a psychological stress condition and in a situation of total lack of empathy.
However, this understanding is an essential passage to lower the psychological anguish that rape will encroach upon her throughout her life. Understanding that true and blissful sexual pleasure is an experience dependent upon the sharing of the emotional tumult set off by the jubilation of feelings leads us to give sexuality a sacred value and, thence, to imagine anew a sexual life, the experience of the forced expropriation notwithstanding (chapters 14 and thereafter of The Lazy Revolution are dedicated  to this subject.
Read on some thoughts about the specific concept of male frigidity.
Read on some thoughts about rape and frigidity).
Likewise, accepting the idea that male’ s frigidity is the main component of phallocratic sexuality (some 50% of men are affected by this syndrome) is essential even if we want to reach that cultural revolution which is our only tool to really contrast the repetition of sexual violence.
In every interview, in every editorial on this subject, we should insist on the point that rapists are poor fellows who cannot come to a climax!
Emotional cripples. The sexuality of porno films is pathetic: that kind of sex is not an agreeable experience. The peak of pleasure, of bliss is attained only by those who let themselves be swept away by the magic of sharing,  of feeling. Kamasutra positions do not  make sex more pleasurable; mutual understanding and emotions do.
This should be our battering ram to have the ear of the millions of males who live in the belief that Moana Pozzi’ s oral sex, performed at the speed of a grinder, is the very best they may wish for themselves.
I have lectured groups of students on sex education for twenty years.
And when I was able to lay bare some youngster boggling in the myth of the super-hard  super-prick  sexuality I realized that he was trapped in an impregnable ideological fortress.
All the beautiful talks about respect, justice and noble feelings bounced off him, hit by such powerful mental bat as is an effective and easy ideology: “I’ m-going-to-stick-my-cock-into-your-mouth-enjoy-you-slut”. The only efficacious release lever is telling the chap: ”My little darling, do you really believe that porno actresses can give super blowjobs?” (Quite obviously, I do not utter those very words because I would be arrested; however, that’ s the message I am trying to convey with a sequence of sophisticated words and double meanings).
If one really wants to get into his ideological castle, one must understand that a 15-year-old is not a phallocrat by vocation. He is a poor wretch clutching to the only thing being offered to him that is not chastity. Deep down, his instinctive side, the spark that brightens and animates him, is spontaneously looking for a happy and shared sexual intimacy but he lacks the words to picture it. Lets us give all such words to him! Starting with the basic concept: there is no pleasure in forcible sexuality.
The second essential point in combating rape is the provision of INFORMATION ABOUT SEX.  Monsters are born out of crass ignorance.
The battle for information about sex has been central for world feminism. However, this did not happen in Italy, a country culturally blocked by catholic-communist moralizing. Such subjects as the use of pelvic muscles during sexual intercourse have been essential for countries North of the Alps (Vaginal Muscles: click here).

In the mid-eighties, I had the privilege of being lynched because I had explained in Tango, the satirical supplement to the daily “Unità”,  in a didactic and detailed key, how to exercise the muscles of the pelvic floor and make use of them during intercourse.
Whilst, in my blog dealing with bullyboys, I have covered the relationship between sexual education and violence, here I would like to provide explicit and precise information on the movement of the pubic-coccygeal zone.
In fact, this is not only a question concerning women’ s physiological wellbeing and orgasmic capacity.
The activation of vaginal muscles during intercourse reverses the sex roles and the male becomes a passive subject in comparison with the woman’ s abilities.
A penis has no muscles!
And only when, during intercourse, a woman sucks the penis with her vagina the man attains a true and deep orgasm (by stimulating the L spot).
Thanks to the information on vaginal movements, we can unhinge and discard the concept of the man penetrating the woman. The male is ensnared, the female is swallowing him in.
The natural physiology of intercourse practised by a woman activating to the fullest the power of her muscles makes HER the most active of the  two partners!
While it may sound like a futile debate, it is a fundamental element in the fight against rape: only when intercourse is practised with a sexually active woman does a man activate the L spot and, thus, reach the apex of his orgasm. THEREFORE, the true and authentic man will look for women who activate inside if he wants to  reach exquisite pleasure.
In matriarchal communities, rape in conceptually incomprehensible because no normal male will ever have any interest in penetrating a DEAD VAGINA.
And this concept (a living vagina will give pleasure and a dead one none!) strengthens our campaign whose aim is to unhinge the dement structure of male chauvinism by revealing and denouncing the rapist’ s frigidity.
Obviously, a complement of general information about sex should be part of this effort. And such information should provide, in addition to particulars about sex anatomy, facts about diverse forms of sexuality, such as the Tender Loving Tantrist Sex, where lovers are indulging in a sort of ecstasy of fondling cuddles. This should be taught in schools because it would reveal to the students that intercourse is a moment of celebration of the sacredness of life and the magic of emotions.  To stand still, sexually sheathed (the woman is penetrated without her man having an erection!),  listen to each other and take pleasure in the minute thrills of joy that love can ooze out. It would let students acquire a vision of sex that is in no way connected to violence but is craving for pleasure to the fullest of feelings and emotions.
The idea behind the Tender Loving Tantra is powerful since it purports the concept of soft penetration. The practice of penetration without an erection shatters away the male archetype of manhood. A woman telling a man: “I don’ t care whether it’ s hard or drooping”  would be attempting on the fascist principles governing sex.
In conclusion, I hope that the movement arising from sexual violence will adopt these two essential communication tools to begin a new phase of the struggle that will, at long last, bring about tangible results.
On the one hand, we should deliver our discourses to all possible audiences and, on the other, demand that  Rai broadcasts programmes dealing with male frigidity, the wonderful possibilities of the female sexual muscles and the sacredness of the ecstasy of emotions.
Let us stop the feeble opposition to the mental machinery of rape.
The patriarchal ideology is a paper tiger. Let us piss on it.


How to drive a woman crazy with pleasure.

Let’ s begin a strategic workshop!

Women are not interested in sexual techniques per se. Men are keen on doing certain things (see the fulminating success of “mutual cunnilingus”);  women are not.
We are different. In point of fact, women like their men to know where their G spot and clitoris are. All in all, women expect a minimum of techniques. Yes, an absolute minimum; i. e.  men should be sensitive enough as to listen to them whilst fondling them softly and slowly.
However, beyond that minimum indispensable knowledge of female anatomy, the grade women will give men is related neither to their technical feats, nor to their peculiar tricks or postures and not even to the size of their penis or biceps.
Women, the absolute majority of them, are looking for something that is not directly related to the sexual act per se. Something that happens before or during intercourse but is not sexual. In the ‘70s, foreplay was the discourse; banalities and nothing else. Women are not interested in having their thighs stroked for 8 minutes before switching to the raw act. Women are moved by the aura, the spirit, the atmosphere, the relation and the symbolism of what is happening. Something the male is hard put to understand. It took me centuries…At long last, I have come to realize that, for women, intercourse is 70% amazement.
Do you want to drive your woman sexually crazy? Amaze her!
However, not in bed. First of all in a restaurant or during a walk. You don’ t necessarily have to arrive with a bouquet of flowers; in any event, that is aright. However, even the bouquet, very much like the foreplay, can become a meaningless, technical gesture. Women want emotions, feelings, starry nights, heart beats, sighs. Women need to feel desired, loved, sought-after, imagined, dreamt of.  Men should think, listen to whatever she may be talking or laughing about, ask her what she’ s fond of…Since we, the males, are wanting in this field, I am beginning here a workshop; and I’ m enlisting you in disclosing how you managed to drive a woman crazy with pleasure as well as asking our ladies to reveal what drove them out of their minds. Quite naturally, I’ m setting a good example. Environment and circumstances: Alcatraz, a lot of people, a noisy mess. I begin writing a sequence of chits of paper with love messages that are more and more explicit and slipping them in places that I’ m certain my wife will, sooner or later, roam through. I shall put on a good act so that she will never suspect my plot, and alter my own handwriting. Married ten years since, I can easily get hold of my wife’ s handbag and drop into it a short note without been noticed…If involved in a much younger affair, one should be more careful. When she has found the third message, Eleonora is set about talking to some friend and hunting out the author thereof. She tries and suggests I did it and I deny most resolutely. I go home before her and I leave my last message in full view on the dashboard of her car. I stick my seventh message into the keyhole of the front door. That message invites her to a date in a room full of candles and promises a body massage with scented oils. And so on.
I hope that many of you will participate in this workshop of ideas about loving each other and playing together. There are millions of tales about courting and millions of stories of break-ups, but practically nothing about inventing a two some life.
If we truly want to drive our women crazy in bed we must understand that they are looking for this high level of relationship. We would undoubtedly benefit from a qualitative leap on our part. Let us fill this vacuum of tales and accounts about what to do and how to behave after the first kiss and before the breakdown of the relationship. Perhaps, if we squeeze our brains and exchange our positive experiences, we can avoid a wonderful loving partnership from falling apart.

WARNING! This is a political action. This is an attack upon war and exploitation;  a tangible and effective way to save human lives and a substantial action to  oppose the Multinationals of  Sorrow.  To-day’ s reality if fully integrated and  interconnected to the point that a butterfly’ s wing-beat  in Sidney can unleash a storm in New York. The chain of reasoning that has generated a problem is unable to solve it. If you want to study in depth the subject matter, look up the index of the most important articles published in this blog and, in particular: The enemy to beat is the linear thought; Mutual Cunnilingus; Female’ s desire and the dream vacation; The rapist is  frigid!  That’ s why. Female ejaculation. When do women ejaculate? Let’s open the debate.

Dear man: are you truly orgastic or are you frigid? Revolution begins from pleasure! Everything you don’ t know about sex on Zen and the art of fucking